moecco VOL.94

Product Information

BC, I understand that you love kids. But wrong guess, I am no where close to the eduaction sector! 0 He isn’t the only one. Mr, the most eccentric member of Takashi Murakami’s stable of pop artists, admits he suffers from lolicon, and recruited junior idols to star in his 2008 film, "Nobody Dies." That is just so wrong in so many ways. You can wiggle and justify all you want, but that is not something a 13 year old chooses to do for fun or money. Somebody is exploiting that. Somebody is committing a crime or thinking of committing one. It is misogyny. It is misandry. It is dehumanizing.

And before you go making arguments about people with kids. I don't have children and don't have any intention of having them. But I do have a niece and I have the children of friends who I care about. Collectively we all work hard to see to it that we show them a good example. Their parents work hard to provide good homes and education. And they do all they can to ensure that they have a good and solid start in life.tkoind2, why don't you be a good sport and show me the exact global regulation that shows that a bikini clad 13 year old is illegal... 0 finally, my ideal to end all this: One is free do absolutely anything until it invades freedom and property of another being. 0 And what would that entail exactly, mate? You seem quite willing to eschew all the limitations and restrictions society places on us for the common good, in favor of some fantastical imagined paradise of pure freedom, but you're painfully sparse on the details and how your vision of letting 13-year-olds do whatever they like would actually pan out. If you see a girl liking an ice cream cone and are turned on sexually...well maybe that is your problem? Live and let live! 0 The parents angents and managers of these kids need to serve some hrad jail time, this is blatant child abuse.

This is why we have welfare services to care for kids with no parents, and to protect kids from abusive parents. Because abusing kids is something a healthy human society does not tolerate. As you admit, such a parent is a misfit. I think you just unwittingly made my argument for me. 0 And there's no way you can compare movie acting to U-15 Junior Gravure modeling. There's no way. I do not see Dakota Fanning running around on the beach, on all fours seductively looking at the camera. 0This is a gray area in Japan, but the residents of Akihabara and I find it reprehensible,” says Takaya Kobayashi, 54, a Chiyoda Ward councilman. this would kill the entire idol industry in one fell blow. someone like aya ueto got started by winning the Japan Bishojo Contest at age 12 and debuted the following year 0

Simple way to deal with this issue. Jail the parents who allow a 13 year old girl to parade in a bikini for money. Also jail the organisers of an event where a 13 year old girl parades in a bikini for money. And the age of consent rule should be quite simple as well. Once a girl can leave high school (16/17 ?) then they can do what they like. Not sure why the age of consent has such confusion in Japan ? 0 On 7 October 2018, she announced her marriage with a man on her official blog. [7] Filmography [ edit ] Films [ edit ]Which country started that "tiny t-shirt" trend for pre-teens, with words like "sexy" and "porn-star" on them? a 13 year old may realise that behaving in certain ways garners her "benefits" from adult men, in fact it is thought that women learn how to behave with men by practising on their fathers. but you fail to see that at 13 a girl is too young to be able to fully understand the true implications of the behaviour she is engaged in. it may endanger her health and her safety but at 13 a child is too young to be able to understand the darker sides of human behaviour The most obvious counter-argument to your suggestions that parents alone should be left to raise their children any way they see fit comes from cases of child abuse in the home. No, not spankings. I’m talking about abuse of the “beer bottle across the head” variety, sexual abuse, starvation. Parents do not have the right to abuse their children. Dead stop. It is society’s obligation to prevent that abuse, if uncovered, and if unabated, society’s obligation (and right) to remove that child from danger, subsequently giving that child a better opportunity to grow into a healthy, productive member of society than he or she would have had in an abusive home. This industry needs to end and the parents should be condemned so pimping out their daughters and sons. 0 Sure they do, like Civil Rights. Yes, the depth and breadth of your historical knowledge is breathtaking only in its narrowness when you suggest that people were somehow “freer” a century, particularly considering over half the population of the United States, for example, had no voice whatsoever in choosing the form of government under which they lived. A century ago, children toiled for 12-16 hours a day in coalmines and factories. One hundred years ago, businesses built themselves up off the literal blood, sweat, and tears of workers forced by economic necessity to toil in sweatshops for minimal wages, under the most dangerous of conditions. Yes, 100 years ago, the world was a grand place, abounding in personal liberty, where religious rights, property rights, political rights, economic rights, and most human rights were determined by one’s gender and the color of one’s skin. Did someone forget to tell you to take off the Rose-Tinted Glasses before you started this discussion? They aren’t working for you.